2012-12-19 11:45:36 |
Kellogs |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
2012-12-19 11:45:49 |
Kellogs |
description |
Hello,
The French OpenERP community is testing your project to calculate CA3 (French tax report).
In CA3, some aggregates are displayed twice, for verification purpose.
http://forum.openerp.com/forum/topic35718.html
This is the case with account
445662 TVA récuparable sur achat intracommunautaire
which is part of two aggregates in the CA3: 08B and 17
Therefore, if I am adding 445662 account to 08B,
and then I add 445662 to 17, the following message is displayed:
Account xxxx already exists in the current template.
IMHO there should be a warning, but still it should be possible to add the account twice.
Would you agree on that ?
Kind regards,
Kellohs |
Hello,
The French OpenERP community is testing your project to calculate CA3 (French tax report).
In CA3, some aggregates are displayed twice, for verification purpose.
http://forum.openerp.com/forum/topic35718.html
This is the case with account
445662 TVA récuparable sur achat intracommunautaire
which is part of two aggregates in the CA3: 08B and 17
Therefore, if I am adding 445662 account to 08B,
and then I add 445662 to 17, the following message is displayed:
Account xxxx already exists in the current template.
IMHO there should be a warning, but still it should be possible to add the account twice.
Would you agree on that ?
Kind regards,
Kellogs |
|
2012-12-19 11:45:59 |
Kellogs |
description |
Hello,
The French OpenERP community is testing your project to calculate CA3 (French tax report).
In CA3, some aggregates are displayed twice, for verification purpose.
http://forum.openerp.com/forum/topic35718.html
This is the case with account
445662 TVA récuparable sur achat intracommunautaire
which is part of two aggregates in the CA3: 08B and 17
Therefore, if I am adding 445662 account to 08B,
and then I add 445662 to 17, the following message is displayed:
Account xxxx already exists in the current template.
IMHO there should be a warning, but still it should be possible to add the account twice.
Would you agree on that ?
Kind regards,
Kellogs |
Hello,
The French OpenERP community is testing your project to calculate CA3 (French tax report). In CA3, some aggregates are displayed twice, for verification purpose.
http://forum.openerp.com/forum/topic35718.html
This is the case with account
445662 TVA récuparable sur achat intracommunautaire
which is part of two aggregates in the CA3: 08B and 17
Therefore, if I am adding 445662 account to 08B,
and then I add 445662 to 17, the following message is displayed:
Account xxxx already exists in the current template.
IMHO there should be a warning, but still it should be possible to add the account twice.
Would you agree on that ?
Kind regards,
Kellogs |
|
2012-12-19 11:46:13 |
Kellogs |
description |
Hello,
The French OpenERP community is testing your project to calculate CA3 (French tax report). In CA3, some aggregates are displayed twice, for verification purpose.
http://forum.openerp.com/forum/topic35718.html
This is the case with account
445662 TVA récuparable sur achat intracommunautaire
which is part of two aggregates in the CA3: 08B and 17
Therefore, if I am adding 445662 account to 08B,
and then I add 445662 to 17, the following message is displayed:
Account xxxx already exists in the current template.
IMHO there should be a warning, but still it should be possible to add the account twice.
Would you agree on that ?
Kind regards,
Kellogs |
Hello,
The French OpenERP community is testing your project to calculate CA3 (French tax report). In CA3, some aggregates are displayed twice, for verification purpose.
http://forum.openerp.com/forum/topic35718.html
This is the case with account
445662 TVA récuparable sur achat intracommunautaire
which is part of two aggregates in the CA3: 08B and 17
Therefore, if I am adding 445662 account to 08B,
and then I add 445662 to 17, the following message is displayed:
Account xxxx already exists in the current template.
IMHO there should be a warning, but still it should be possible to add the account twice. Would you agree on that ?
Kind regards,
Kellogs |
|