No support for OpenDocument texts when upgrading from 2.6

Bug #564722 reported by Milan Bouchet-Valat
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
AbiWord
Confirmed
High
abiword (Ubuntu)
Incomplete
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: abiword

After upgrading from Karmic, Abiword was not able to open .odt files correctly, but seemed to consider them as plain text files. I discovered Open and Save dialogs did not even list ODT as a known type, nor many of the text format plugins can support (only .abw, .doc and a few were listed). Removing ~/.Abisuite fixed that.

So I think there needs to be a migration system to detect new plugins. A hack for Ubuntu could be to remove the directory, with the downside of loosing some data.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: abiword 2.8.2-2ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.31-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Fri Apr 16 16:01:27 2010
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=fr_FR:fr:en_GB:en
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: abiword

Revision history for this message
Milan Bouchet-Valat (nalimilan) wrote :
Changed in abiword:
status: Unknown → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Charlie Kravetz (cjkgeek) wrote :

Thanks for reporting this bug and any supporting documentation. Since this bug has enough information provided for a developer to begin work, I'm going to mark it as confirmed and let them handle it from here.

Thank you for forwarding this upstream to abiword.

Changed in abiword (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Medium
status: New → Triaged
Revision history for this message
msevior (msevior-gmail) wrote : Re: [Bug 564722] Re: No support for OpenDocument texts when upgrading from 2.6

This bug is caused by a failure to package the abiword plugins. In
particular the OpenDocument import/exporter.

On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 3:01 AM, Charlie Kravetz <email address hidden> wrote:
> Thanks for reporting this bug and any supporting documentation. Since
> this bug has enough information provided for a developer to begin work,
> I'm going to mark it as confirmed and let them handle it from here.
>
> Thank you for forwarding this upstream to abiword.
>
> ** Changed in: abiword (Ubuntu)
>   Importance: Undecided => Medium
>
> ** Changed in: abiword (Ubuntu)
>       Status: New => Triaged
>
> --
> No support for OpenDocument texts when upgrading from 2.6
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564722
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of AbiWord
> Stable Builds, which is subscribed to AbiWord.
>
> Status in AbiWord: Confirmed
> Status in “abiword” package in Ubuntu: Triaged
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: abiword
>
> After upgrading from Karmic, Abiword was not able to open .odt files correctly, but seemed to consider them as plain text files. I discovered Open and Save dialogs did not even list ODT as a known type, nor many of the text format plugins can support (only .abw, .doc and a few were listed). Removing ~/.Abisuite fixed that.
>
> So I think there needs to be a migration system to detect new plugins. A hack for Ubuntu could be to remove the directory, with the downside of loosing some data.
>
> ProblemType: Bug
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
> Package: abiword 2.8.2-2ubuntu1
> ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.31-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
> Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic i686
> Architecture: i386
> Date: Fri Apr 16 16:01:27 2010
> EcryptfsInUse: Yes
> ProcEnviron:
>  LANGUAGE=fr_FR:fr:en_GB:en
>  PATH=(custom, user)
>  LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
>  SHELL=/bin/bash
> SourcePackage: abiword
>
>
>

Revision history for this message
Milan Bouchet-Valat (nalimilan) wrote :

Martin: Could you elaborate more on that? What do you think Ubuntu devs should do? Plugins are shipped with the main abiword package now.

Revision history for this message
msevior (msevior-gmail) wrote :

Hi Milan,

Sorry I have no idea what is being shipped with Ubuntu. Certainly
abiword-2.8 has far better odt support than 2.6.x. I make development
builds of abiword all the time and odt support works very well. I use
abiword-2.8.4 several times a day for real work in Fedora 12 where odt
and docx support works fine. I wrote of what my guess of what the
issue was (no opendocument plugins) if it is not that I'm stumped.

Martin

On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Milan Bouchet-Valat <email address hidden> wrote:
> Martin: Could you elaborate more on that? What do you think Ubuntu devs
> should do? Plugins are shipped with the main abiword package now.
>
> --
> No support for OpenDocument texts when upgrading from 2.6
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564722
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of AbiWord
> Stable Builds, which is subscribed to AbiWord.
>
> Status in AbiWord: Confirmed
> Status in “abiword” package in Ubuntu: Triaged
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: abiword
>
> After upgrading from Karmic, Abiword was not able to open .odt files correctly, but seemed to consider them as plain text files. I discovered Open and Save dialogs did not even list ODT as a known type, nor many of the text format plugins can support (only .abw, .doc and a few were listed). Removing ~/.Abisuite fixed that.
>
> So I think there needs to be a migration system to detect new plugins. A hack for Ubuntu could be to remove the directory, with the downside of loosing some data.
>
> ProblemType: Bug
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
> Package: abiword 2.8.2-2ubuntu1
> ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.31-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
> Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic i686
> Architecture: i386
> Date: Fri Apr 16 16:01:27 2010
> EcryptfsInUse: Yes
> ProcEnviron:
>  LANGUAGE=fr_FR:fr:en_GB:en
>  PATH=(custom, user)
>  LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
>  SHELL=/bin/bash
> SourcePackage: abiword
>
>
>

Revision history for this message
Milan Bouchet-Valat (nalimilan) wrote :

Quality of Abiword's ODT support is not at stake here. The problem is that while the plugins are installed, they are not detected *until you remove ~/.Abisuite. Is it known that the list of plugins is statically saved in a file there? Should a command be run to update that list? That doesn't seem to be an Ubuntu-only bug to me.

Changed in abiword:
importance: Unknown → High
Revision history for this message
Simon Quigley (tsimonq2) wrote :

Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu. Ubuntu 10.04.4 Desktop reached EOL on May 9, 2013.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases

I've tried recreating this bug with your release and was unable to, given the information you've provided. Please upgrade to the latest version and re-test. If the bug is still reproducible, increase the verbosity of the steps to recreate it so we can try again.

Do feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

Changed in abiword (Ubuntu):
status: Triaged → Incomplete
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.