RPM

Package have bad signatures lib64wps0.2_2

Bug #910707 reported by Jeff Johnson
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
RPM
Won't Fix
Wishlist
Jeff Johnson
Mandriva
Confirmed
Medium

Bug Description

URPMI has a policy check that claims a signature is "BAD"
when not signed by the "official" Mandriva key.

Jeff Johnson (n3npq)
tags: added: mandriva signatures
Changed in mandriva:
importance: Unknown → Medium
status: Unknown → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
devzero2000 (pinto-elia) wrote :

It is unclear whether there might be some point of contact with an undeniable signature scheme. For now look like a political distro choice

Changed in rpm:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
Revision history for this message
Jeff Johnson (n3npq) wrote :

The part that is _NOT_ political is the sloppy error message using "bad"

warning: /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/lib64wps0.2_2-0.2.2-1-mdv2011.0.x86_64.rpm:
Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 70771ff3
The following packages have bad signatures:

Revision history for this message
Jeff Johnson (n3npq) wrote :

This is a URPM, not an RPM, issue.

Changed in rpm:
status: New → Won't Fix
assignee: nobody → Jeff Johnson (n3npq)
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.