Ubuntu
bcmwl package

package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build

Bug #907175 reported by Alexander Petkun on 2011-12-21

This bug report is a duplicate of: Bug #580594: bcmwl kernel module failed to build (error: linux/autoconf.h: No such file or directory). Edit Remove

This bug affects 1 person

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	bcmwl (Ubuntu)	New	Undecided	Unassigned

Bug Description

Building initial module for 2.6.35-28-generic

Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 2.6.35-28-generic (x86_64)
Consult the make.log in the build directory
/var/lib/dkms/bcmwl/5.60.48.36+bdcom/build/ for more information.
dpkg: не удалось обработать параметр bcmwl-kernel-source (--configure):
подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation возвратил код ошибки 10
При обработке следующих пакетов произошли ошибки:
bcmwl-kernel-source
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-37.81-generic 2.6.32.49+drm33.21
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-37-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Dec 20 13:50:32 2011
ErrorMessage: bcmwl kernel module failed to build
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20110719.3)
PackageVersion: 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu3
SourcePackage: bcmwl
Title: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build

Tags:

Revision history for this message

Alexander Petkun (alpstor) wrote on 2011-12-21:

DKMSBuildLog.txt Edit (830 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Dependencies.txt Edit (1.0 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")

Revision history for this message

Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt) wrote on 2011-12-22:

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 580594, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Feel free to continue to report any other bugs you may find.